Skip to Main Content

Generative Artificial Intelligence and University Study

Digital and AI tools you can use to support your studies.

Using generative AI tools critically and with integrity

If you are unable to view this video on YouTube it is also available on YuJa - view the Using generative AI tools critically and with integrity video on YuJa (University username and password required)

Being critical

Given all the limitations of generative AI tools (in particular when it comes to accuracy, reliability, attribution, and accountability), it becomes important to approach them with a critical mindset. So, what role could generative AI play within the context of your University study? 

For non-assessed tasks and enhancing your learning, generative AI tools may offer some benefits. For example, an initial place to get basic explanations of concepts that can springboard deeper research; or a soundboard for generating ideas and potential options for projects; or an additional check for your spelling and grammar. 

If unsure whether to use Generative AI, think of the following questions:  

  • What is my learning objective and could an AI tool help me develop as a learner? 

  • Do I have sufficient knowledge and/or evidence to verify information and factcheck for inaccuracies? 

  • Do I have clear reasons for the choices I make (e.g. the prompts I use)? 

  • Is the AI helping with my understanding of concepts and ability to ask further questions? 

  • Do I have sufficient agency and control over my interaction with the AI tool? 

Diagram showing that it is safe to use ChatGPT only if it does not matter whether the output is true.

When is it safe to use ChatGPT? (Source UNESCO 2023, p.6).

 

Remember:  

Every time you use a Generative AI tool for saving time or as a shortcut and not as a developmental tool, you are likely missing out on a learning opportunity. Focusing on the end-product of an assignment is not helpful for educational purposes, as most of our learning happens through the process of working and creating.  

 

For assessed tasks, you should be given guidance in your assessment brief on whether use of GenAI is permitted. Assessments are classified as follows:

  • Category 1= GenAI may not be used;
  • Category 2 = GenAI may be used to support learning; and
  • Category 3 = GenAI use is encouraged and incorporated in the assessment task.

Most 'traditional' coursework will fall under Category 2. If uncertain, do ask your module convenor for clarification.

When you are preparing your assignment, it is important that you maintain agency and control over the work you create. In the same way you would not be asking a friend to write your essay, you should not outsource your work to an AI chatbot! It may be okay to chat with an AI bot (like you would do with one of your colleagues) about potential topics to look into, about the key concepts of relevance, or about possible ways to structure your assignment. However, the decision making and responsibility lie with you. An AI chatbot cannot be trusted to provide accurate, thoroughly researched, properly credited, and thoughtful analysis – this is your job, and it is what will help you learn in the process.

Remember the reason why you've come to university and the value of your degree: you're here to develop your own knowledge and skills. 

 

To summarise:  

It is potentially beneficial to use Generative AI as a building block to enhance understanding that is then reinforced and/or challenged by further research and learning. In contrast, it is UNETHICAL and UNSAFE to ask a Generative AI tool to produce answers and then use these in assessments as one’s own work. 

 

FAQs: 

  • What if using Generative AI is part of the assignment instructions?  

  • In some cases, it may be part of your assessed task to generate AI outputs and use them in various ways (these assessments will fall under Category 3); for example, you may be asked to critique them, to evaluate and select among different options, to assess biases that may be embedded in these, or to compare them with your own work. In any such case, you must follow the instructions given by your module convenor and use the AI tool at the appropriate stage of the task and for the specified purpose. You must also acknowledge and describe how the AI outputs were generated and used in your work. If, after checking the instructions, you have any questions about using AI as part of your assignment, check with your module convenor for clarification.  

 

  • What if a software product I have been using has automatically added new AI features? Is it still okay to use this software? 

  • AI-based features included in commonly used word-processing software may become more and more the norm. Such features may look like advanced autocomplete options, or may make personalised suggestions that you can adopt or reject. Normally, you do not have to acknowledge use of these features. Remember, however, to use their suggestions according to your own judgement. 

 

  • It all sounds confusing! Why should I bother engaging with AI at all? 

  • It is important to experiment with and understand these tools, as they are becoming part of our lives. As a student at university, you would be expected to decide when and how to use these tools, with criticality and accountability. In addition, making informed decisions about deployment, management, and use of AI tools in the workplace may become a key employability skill.  So, the answer is not to shy away from this technology, but to test it, in order to understand its limitations and come up with beneficial applications. 

Examples of acceptable and non-acceptable use

Some examples of developmental use of Generative AI include:  

  1. Asking AI to generate revision questions on a topic, which you can then use for practising in exam conditions. 

  1. Brainstorming titles for the article you plan to publish based on your dissertation or thesis. 

  1. Exploring alternative ways to structure your essay; you can then compare all the options, and decide which one you prefer (or come up with a new one!) 

  1. Factchecking and testing its abilities and limits through experimentation. Discussing your findings with your peers and/or your tutors. 

Can you think of any other applications? 

 

Some examples of unsafe and/or unethical use of generative AI include: 

  1. Asking the tool to produce answers, designs, or code that you then include in your assignment submission (regardless of whether use of AI is acknowledged), unless explicitly asked to do so. 

  1. Asking for information and trusting the answer without independent verification and fact checking. 

  1. Submitting something - e.g. a blog post, an article, an essay, an image - that was produced using AI, without acknowledgment of how it was generated. 

  1. Entering in a Generative AI system survey data you have collected, without consent from the participants.

 

Asking for help and guidance: if uncertain, have a discussion with your lecturers, your academic tutor, or Study Advice. 

Being transparent

Be aware:  

  • Fraudulent representation of AI-generated work as your own constitutes plagiarism! 

  • Reporting fabricated data constitutes fraud and is also a form of academic misconduct. Even if these data were produced by ChatGPT, responsibility and accountability lies with the human user! Therefore, it is important to thoroughly research a subject independently, and not trust the information provided in generative AI outputs, even if it appears to be cited. 

 

  • When do I need to cite GenAI?

If you are using content that was created by a GenAI tool, e.g. a quote or an image, or referring to an interaction you had with it, then you will need to cite the GenAI tool as your source. Examples of how this citation should be formatted can be found at the relevant section of the UoR Citing References guide and at the Cite Them Right platform (see links below).

 

  • When do I need to provide an acknowledgement of GenAI use?

In case you decide to use generative AI assistance (if permitted), it is important to acknowledge and accurately describe how this assistance was used in the production of your work.

An example of acknowledgment statement may look like this: 

"I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT 3.5 (OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com/) to produce a draft outline for further research. I confirm that no output generated by GenAI has been presented as my own work."

Check your assessment brief for a template acknowledgement statement and follow the instructions given there!

You may be asked to provide the following information to acknowledge use of AI:  

  • Tool and version 

  • Purpose of use 

  • Stage(s) of the process in which it was used 

  • How it was used: which prompts did you try and which outputs did you end up using? 

  • What content was generated 

  • How the generated content was evaluated and edited 

It is always advisable to keep a record of any interaction you have with a Generative AI tool, so you can return to it later and provide it as evidence in your work (for example, this information may be needed in a methods section, in an authorship statement, in an appendix, or as a footnote).  

Protecting your data

Free products frequently come with a hidden price. A common implicit exchange includes giving companies access to user data. 

Before you subscribe to any service, check the agreement, and in particular their data privacy policy.  

Questions to ask yourself:  

  • How are user data used by this company? 

  • Are they shared and with whom? Only internally or with third parties? 

  • Are they used for further training the AI model?

  • Can I opt out from training these models? Do I want to? 

  • Given the above, what information about myself do I feel safe sharing in my interactions with the AI agent? 

Test your understanding

Which examples in the table below represent developmental use of Generative AI and which ones are unsafe and/or unethical? Why? Think about your answers before checking the solutions tab. 

Example use

Is it reliable use? 

Is it ethical use? 

Why? 

Formulating revision questions for exam practice. 

 

 

 

Asking for improvement recommendations on a draft. Then selectively implementing any of these that make sense. Use of AI is acknowledged. 

 

 

 

Brainstorming titles for an article I plan to publish based on my dissertation/thesis. 

 

 

 

Asking an AI tool to produce answers, designs, or code that I then include in my assignment submission (use of AI is acknowledged). 

 

 

 

Reorganising my notes, to test different techniques of note making. 

 

 

 

Publishing a blog post that was produced using ChatGPT without acknowledgment of how it was generated. 

 

 

 

Experimenting with prompts and factchecking the answers, to test its potential. 

 

 

 

Entering primary interview data I have collected to conduct thematic analysis without consent from the interviewees. 

 

 

 

Asking for rewording of a definition to help me clarify a concept and improve my understanding. 

 

 

 

 

Assess the answers below provided by Study Advice. 

Example use

Is it reliable use? 

Is it ethical use? 

Why? 

Formulating revision questions for exam practice. 

Yes 

Yes 

Generating questions can be a great resource to test your knowledge – as long as you don’t rely on the AI tool to provide or evaluate the answers! 

Asking for improvement recommendations on a draft. Then selectively implementing any of these that make sense. Use of AI is acknowledged. 

Yes 

Using AI for developmental feedback can be useful, as long as you understand the reasons why you want to accept one recommendation and reject another.  

Ethically, of course use of AI should be acknowledged; firstly, however, it should be clarified whether use of AI is permitted for the specific assignment. 

Brainstorming titles for an article I plan to publish based on my dissertation/thesis. 

Yes  

Yes 

As long as the title you select represents your work, there is nothing wrong with getting some inspiration! 

Asking an AI tool to produce answers, designs, or code that I then include in my assignment submission as they are. Use of AI is acknowledged. 

No 

The outputs should be first factchecked and thoroughly researched. Otherwise, the work could contain inaccuracies, omissions, or fabricated data. 

Ethically, it should be first clarified whether use of AI is permitted. 

Reorganising my notes, to test different techniques of note making. 

Yes 

Yes 

Experimentation that inspires new ways to organise information can be useful for adopting more effective practices.  

Publishing a blog post that was produced using ChatGPT without acknowledgment of how it was generated. 

No 

No 

The post may contain inaccuracies or falsehoods, as the information was not confirmed via credible sources.  

Not acknowledging how the post was generated would be misleading the audience – therefore unethical. 

Experimenting with prompts and evaluating the answers, to test its potential. 

Yes 

Yes 

This is a great way to enhance understanding of how these tools work, what they can do and what they cannot. 

Entering primary interview data I have collected to conduct thematic analysis. 

No 

No 

There is no way to control how the data may be used or disclosed once entered. Therefore, this application would not comply with ethical clearance requirements, due to privacy and data protection risks. 

Asking for rewording of a definition to help me clarify a concept and improve my understanding. 

Yes 

Yes 

This can be a useful approach, as long as it is followed by further independent learning and interrogation of the concept.